Archive for the The Wrong Right Turn Category

Immigration Reform, or Fools’ Kabuki?

Posted in Immigration, RINO-Plasty, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , , , , , , , on April 27, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

130127_schumer_durbin_menendez_bennet_graham_flake_mccain_rubio_ap_605Marco Rubio is being an opportunistic prig for trying to convince the American people that The Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013 is immigration reform. There, that didn’t hurt a bit. Prig? Did I really use the word prig?

No, really. I hate saying that but it’s true. This guy should be spectacular. He is the quintessential American story. Instead, he dares lecture conservatives on immigration as though we are a half-quart low on empathy. Or worse, racists. Which of course is a left-wing argument.

First, let’s dispel this whole “compassionate conservative” hokum. Real conservatives are compassionate. It’s the RINOs and Democrats who have fostered the inhumanity on our southern border. Thousands have been sold into slavery, tortured and murdered on the road north.

The Bushes seem to be a good and decent family, but they wouldn’t have a clue about how to live in the twenty-first century without Secret Service agents mowing their lawns and piggybacking them out of airplanes.

Let’s get this straight: It is not racist or even discompassionate to want to know that one’s gardener’s resume does not include: Last Position: Five years: Matamoros serial killer.

The idea that we should not be using enormous caution in allowing anyone into our country is certifiable. People are trying to kill us!

Who are we fooling? Rubio and his Gang of Eight — known in Democrat circles as the Gang of Four and Four Really Easy to Punk Republicans — haven’t had the slightest intention of reforming immigration.

Until Boston, they were simply trying to find a way to legalize between eleven and 20 million interlopers without getting tossed out of office in their home states.

The Kabuki the Left has labeled as “immigration reform” breaks down in two parts: what to do with the free riders who are already here, and eventual Southern border security. There has been virtually no talk about the 80,000 legal aliens who are here on student visas, 15,000 of whom haven’t attended a day of school.

Neither has there been a lot of discussion on just what qualifications an individual should have before he or she is even considered for entry into the U.S. Educating potential Saudi terrorists and Chinese hackers should not be high on our priorities list when it comes to visa qualifications.

Roger Ailes must have waterboarded Bob Beckel, but the guy is right on the dime with his suggestion that we place a moratorium on these two categories. But a moratorium on all immigration should be enacted until sane new policies are written.

Immigration is not a right, and this new legislation only benefits the Democratic Party’s political agenda.

Congress’s job is to secure every portal in which entry can be made into the United States; assuring that only individuals and families who wish to come here have the skills or education to be viable in our society, and that they do not present potential danger to the country.

Marco Rubio’s job does not entail following the advice of some doughy bean counter in a fruitless effort to recruit Hispanic votes for the Republican Party, or, more obviously, his future political aspirations.

TEA PARTY ALERT! Ayotte, Graham, Toomey and Flake Among 16 GOP Gun Control Sellouts

Posted in Gun Control, GUNS, RINO-Plasty, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , , , , , on April 11, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

PHP4C5361E6A2DFDThis is what I’m saying to you nutty Republicans.

Sixteen GOP senators voted this morning to prevent Rand Paul, Mike Lee and Ted Cruz from filibustering the Democrat push for new gun control legislation. Mark my words, one of these gomers will be on Fox News tonight telling us not to worry, we can still hunt.

No one has even READ this bill!  

Today’s defeat, folks, was a RINO-orchestrated intraparty power play.

Okay, Susan Collins we understand, her lips move when she reads to herself, but Tea Party-supported Pat Toomey, joining with Joe Manchin?

Hot Air:

… Democrats voting against proceeding: Just two, Mark Pryor and Mark Begich. Everyone else in the caucus except for Frank Lautenberg, who was absent, voted yes. A message to red-state Dems (and aisle-crossing Republicans) from the NRA:

We hope the Senate will replace the current provisions of S. 649 with language that is properly focused on addressing mental health inadequacies; prosecuting violent criminals; and keeping our kids safe in their schools. Should it fail to do so, the NRA will make an exception to our standard policy of not “scoring” procedural votes and strongly oppose a cloture motion to move to final passage of S. 649.

Whole lotta NRA ratings are going down tomorrow. Toomey’s reportedly telling friends that he hopes for six to eight Republican votes to beat the next filibuster on cloture (although Mark Kirk appears to be the only sure thing right now). That’s possible, but is it possible to get to 60 with “only” that number of Republicans? You’d need at least five even if the Democratic caucus votes unanimously, and that’s a big if given the pressure on Pryor, Baucus, Landrieu, and Begich to block the bill. I can even almost imagine a scenario where Reid gets 60 votes for cloture and then the bill fails on the final up-or-down vote. There’ll be plenty of centrists, starting with the red-state Dems I just named, who’ll be looking to please both sides by casting a yes vote on cloture to beat the GOP’s filibuster and then a no on the bill itself to prove their pro-gun bona fides. If the GOP votes no as a bloc on the final vote, you’d need just six Democrats to join them to kill this thing. But Reid won’t allow that humiliation to happen. Presumably, if he knows he can’t get to 50, he’ll pull the bill. Stay tuned. [More]

Look, we don’t have a bill yet, but ANY EFFORT to further the liberal agenda to infringe upon The Right to Bear Arms, PERIOD, is a sellout. When are you Republicans going to get smart and take away these RINO’s right to junket?

Conservatives need to mount a national campaign to defeat Republicans who cave to the RINO leadership in both houses.

Jeff Flake? Was that the best you Arizonans could do? Sarah Palin even supported the guy.  Sarah, Sarah, Sarah! When they have a face that can double as a can opener, it’s time to rethink the endorsement.

Want gun control? Kill a Gangbanger Near You!

RINOs Still Goring Siblings: Coulter Attacks Palin… Again

Posted in RINO-Plasty, Sarah Palin, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , , , , on April 9, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

ann-coulter-tall__width_420What is it with tall bottle-blonde Republican boneracks with obvious breast augmentations and Sarah Palin, anyway?

You might know Tucker Carlson’s The Daily Caller would pick this up and go with it without comment. Man, this guy has been punked so many times by the Right for his swipes at Palin, he must be sending Rush Limbaugh flowers and chocolates by now.

TheDC:

During Geraldo Rivera’s Monday radio show on WABC-AM in New York City, conservative commentator Ann Coulter recalled a story about former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s desire to groom former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin when she first achieved national prominence.

Coulter, author of “Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama,” said she had heard from those close to Thatcher.

“One thing that I know, because I know people who know her, is when Sarah Palin first burst on the scene, she wanted to have a meeting with Palin, because she saw raw political talent, but wanted to teach Sarah Palin to do what she did,” Coulter said. “I just know it from friends of hers — to teach [Palin] to speak proper English. Sarah Palin did not meet with her. And just a year or two ago, when Sarah Palin was promoting some reality show or something, she went to England and she announced to the press that she was planning on dropping by to see Lady Thatcher. And Lady Thatcher put out the word that she would not be available.”

I mean, what’s with all the vitriol? Just because Palin can risk a pair of 5-inch heels without being mistaken for Chris Kaman. Coulter made her reputation by doing things like calling John Edwards a ‘faggot’, but its hard to be convinced of her conservatism when it’s so difficult to find a Democrat she hasn’t slept with.

Okay, that was low. I have just summarily slapped myself. But it was certainly no less called for than Coulter’s attacks on the Governor.

In the first place, the story of Palin’s visit to England isn’t true. Thatcher was rumored to have extended an invitation to Governor Palin, but the former PM had been suffering from dementia since 2005. Sarah Palin has never been to England.

The reason we are being so mean-spirited is because Coulter has seemingly gone out of her way to ridicule Palin; she has attacked everything from the pitch of the Governor’s voice to her folksy regional accent (something they attacked Lincoln for, incidentally), at tremendous detriment to the party she claims to support.

Sarah Palin has been a positive voice for her party. What, you think Karl Rove was responsible for the 2010 Tea Party revolution?

It should be noted here that Democrats never trash Democrats publically. Never. Ever. Period.

It is one thing if Coulter disagrees with Palin’s on substantive issues; it is quite another to deride her publically to the universal delight of liberals.

I mean, don’t Republicans have enough trouble winning elections without alienating half their party base?

Earth to Ann: THREE MILLION CONSERVATIVES STAYED HOME AND YOU GUYS LOST THE ELECTION BECAUSE OF THIS CRAP.

McCain: Where’s My Senate?

Posted in RINO-Plasty, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , , , , , , , , on April 8, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

 

th

Is it just me, or is John McCain one three-martini lunch past stick-a-fork-in-it?

Hot Air:

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Sunday expressed opposition to possible GOP efforts to filibuster a Senate gun-control measure, saying he did not “understand” the move to block debate.

“I don’t understand it,” said McCain on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.”

“What are we afraid of? Why would we not want… if this issue is as important as all of us think it is, why not take it to one of the world’s greatest deliberative bodies – that’s one of the greatest exaggerations in history by the way – but you know why not take it up, an amendment and debate. The American people will profit from it,” said the Arizona senator. 

Yeah, buster! How would’ve all those great RINO compromises like McCain-Kennedy and McCain-Feingold get done if I’d started standing up for constitutional rights? This is not a Frank Capra movie, you know.

We tried to warn you guys in Arizona. J.D. Hayworth may be a doofus, but he was our doofus. What? McCain transformed himself into a border hawk overnight, called in a chit from Sarah Palin, and you guys bought it? Hahahahahahah!!!

Mike Flynn Big Government:

… With all due respect to Sen. McCain, that is almost completely backward.

The purpose of the US Senate is not to be some federal debating society. It is not tasked with taking the great issues of the day and giving its “august” members a platform for their musings on policy. The public does not look to the Senate for guidance in its deliberations on the issues.

Okay, so far we agree with everything but the ‘With all due respect to Sen. McCain’ part, but continue.

The Senate’s first, and only, task is to uphold the Constitution.

Today, Senators are just House members juiced-up on steroids. Worse, they have a habit of putting decorum and the traditions and processes of the institution above foundational principles. …

If one believes a legislative proposal is, on its face, unconstitutional, the ability to offer amendments is of little solace. Sens. Cruz, Lee and Paul, among other Senators, believe legislation to limit gun rights is, by its nature, unconstitutional. …

A filibuster against gun control legislation is upholding the greatest tradition of the Senate, i.e. acting as a bulwark against the federal government’s natural inclination to expand its power. … Any proposal that tramples on constitutional rights should never grace the floor of the Senate.

Troublemaker! Now this is the same preposterously radical tea party gibberish we heard in 2010! You guys think just because you won a couple of House victories…

Ah, for the good ol’ days. Teddy Kennedy, a quart of Jameson’s, and good old fashioned drunken bipartisan progress.

Star Parker: ‘Gay Conservative’ Is an Oxymoron

Posted in RINO-Plasty, The GLAAD Bag, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , , , on March 24, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

star_parker-e1361794901568-300x270

A Mojo Replay Day! Star Parker: From 2011, Updated with Current Links…

Miss Smarty Pants black conservative Star Parker is making trouble again. This time she has dared, not to just be black and Republican, but to be… well, logical!

Townhall  via The Right Scoop:

CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Conference, has been an annual gig for me for years. But this year I concluded it was not my place and I declined to participate in the various venues at the event for which I was invited.

Yes, the reason I declined was the inclusion of GOProud, a group identifying itself as representing “gay conservatives and their allies,” as a sponsor of the event.

And it’s the reason why some of the nation’s most important conservative organizations – the Heritage Foundation, the American Family Association, Concerned Women of America, Family Research Council, Media Research Center, and the National Organization for Marriage – did not participate.

The founder and chairman of GOProud removed any doubt on my part that not participating was the correct decision by dismissing these groups as “losers,” “clowns,” and “not relevant.”

I, of course, have been accused of being worse than a clown. The barrage regularly comes in from the left. But this is a first that I’ve had to listen to this kind of stuff from a group that postures as “conservative.”

I became a conservative in church. I thought I was doing okay in my previous life – scamming the welfare system, going to the beach, soaking in my welfare subsidized hot tub, treating sex as a hobby, and abortion as birth control. [More]

Now this is a prime example of why African Americans should stay liberal and on Welfare, in Section 8 housing, and just plain old ignorant Sheila Jackson Lee black folks and everything.

What do you know about recruiting minorities anyway, Star Parker, Tea Party extremist?

Everyone knows that gays are born hilariously homosexual. Riotously ‘the other way.’ Rolling in the aisles gay, and can be as conservative as apple pie… Just because they have different dating etiquette and stuff.

Republicans are the BIG TENT PARTY Miss Smarty Pants showoff!

Because we are INCLUSIVE and DIVERSE and TOLERANT and… and… well, everything the Democrats are and more.

Who cares about the conservative base anyway?

Tea Party: Preibus Non Grata?

Posted in RINO-Plasty, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , , , , on March 20, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

reince-priebusYou thought it couldn’t get any worse after Michael Steele’s financial mismanagement and lesbian bar recruiting escapades?

No, no one has caught Karl Rove in a J. Edgar Hoover little black cocktail dress, yet, but the establishment GOP still seems to be having a time communicating on the right.

Some right-leaning blogs are touting Reince Priebus’ new party ‘autopsy,’ but frankly it left us scratching our heads around here.

Big Government:

After the Republican National Committee released its “autopsy” report highlighting the path forward for the GOP on Monday, conservatives blasted the RNC for proposing changes they feel would blunt the ability of grassroots conservatives to beat establishment candidates at the presidential level. 

The report proposes shortening the primary calendar for the next presidential cycle and holding a series of regional primaries that would be a series of “super primaries.” Critics claim it is heavy on process, metrics, and outreach to celebrities and minorities while being short on conservative substance—which, they fear, would ensure more Mitt Romneys are nominated over insurgent Tea Party and grassroots candidates like Ted Cruz.

Brent Bozell, chairman of ForAmerica, said there was not much that excited him about the report and accused the Republican establishment of being “obsessed with identifying problems and solutions from the top-down instead of from the bottom-up.”

“It’s the exact same thing as (GOP strategist) Karl Rove saying they’re going to pick candidates. That ensures that establishment candidates are the only ones with a chance,” Bozell told The Hill.

Autopsy report’? Guys, in the first place, if your party needs an autopsy, that makes you pall-bearers, not surgeons. Kick the dirt over it and go home, already!

The calculus is not difficult: Two enormous establishment presidential election losses sandwiching a midterm Tea Party landslide over the Democrat controlled Congress and governorships? What about party unity do these people not get? Here it is: The GOP cannot survive without its conservative wing.

The RNC would do better to have Karl Rove conduct seminars on How To Get 3 Million Conservatives To Stay Home. At least it will prepare them for the losses they are likely to face if they keep this nonsense up.

Some in the establishment have ridiculously picked up on the Democrat meme: The Tea Party (code for ultra-right wing wackos) would be too far right for Ronald Reagan. Maybe it was even true in 1981. But anyone who has studied Reagan knows that he was a work in progress, and that he continually transitioned to the right, over the course of his political career.

The difference in today’s GOP as opposed to Reagan’s? Ronald Reagan knew how to message his conservative views to  American society, as a whole, rather than alter them to attract a particular minority voting block.

The problem as we see it is Priebus and the establishment wing of the party. The GOP can either have a party, or succumb to the Washington ‘consultant, lobbyist, and establishment complex.’ They cannot successfully do both.

Just as the Constitution is not a ‘living, breathing document,’ neither is conservatism alterable to so-called ‘evolving’ societal mores and ideas.

Rove’s Thin Skin

Posted in RINO-Plasty, Sarah Palin, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , on March 17, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

s-karl-rove-sarah-palin-largeKarl Rove’s had a rough week. It started when Democrat pollster Pat Caddell brought down the house at CPAC on the “Republican establishment and its political consulting class,” and only got worse as the days wore on.

Next, Rush Limbaugh jumped in with Caddell on his Friday show.

“They’re all moderates. None of them are really conservative,” Limbaugh said of the GOP consultant class. “They say they are, and they think they’ve got the recipe to win.” However, Rush ads, “[Romney] won the independents, just like these brainiacs said,” Limbaugh said. “But four million conservatives sat home and didn’t vote.”

Even Donald Trump took a shot.

But it wasn’t over. Next came Sarah Palin’s blistering stem-winder on the final day in which she told the crowd: “The last thing we need is Washington, D.C., vetting our candidates” and said, “The architects can head on back to the great Lone Star state and put their names on some ballot.”

Question: How do you know when a RINO has thin skin?

Well, first he gets defensive and pleads ignorance.

The DC [Excerpts]:

“Well, first of all I live in Texas and not Washington,” Rove said. “Second of all, look, Sarah Palin should be agreeing with this. She didn’t support Todd Akin, and when he said the reprehensible things he said, she wisely came out and said he ought to get out of the race — the ‘legitimate rape’ candidate in Missouri. If she can play in primaries, other people can play in primaries.”

Uh, yeeees. But Palin did not bail on the duly nominated candidate with $2 million and all but cede the contest to Claire McCaskill, either. Akin should have withdrawn, but he didn’t, and he was the only Republican in the race. McCaskill was better?

Then he claims selfless sacrifice.

“But I do have to set the record straight about two things,” he continued. “I’m a volunteer. I don’t take a dime from American Crossroads, and I pay my own travel expenses out of my own pocket. I thought Sarah Palin was about encouraging grassroots activity. I’m a volunteer.”

And all the colored girls sang, “All my trials, Laud, will sooooon be ovaaah.” Poor Karl! Someone pinch those pudgy cheeks. Karl Rove has made multiple millions of dollars fronting establishment Republicans for over two decades! He is without doubt one of the most powerful men in national election politics today.

Then he gets personal.

“I would say this though — I don’t think I’m a particularly good candidate, a sort of a balding fat guy. And second of all, I’d say if I did run for office and win, I’d serve out my term. I wouldn’t leave office midterm.”

Good one, Karl. Of course it might have helped if you and your RINO cronies hadn’t publicly piled on in the Left’s all-out anti-Palin offensive, beginning in 2008, to the detriment of your own candidate and party.

Then for the next two years, you and the brilliant strategists who gave us Sure-Win Willard anonymously sourced liberal media hit pieces in order to stick a fork in a potential Palin candidacy. Whoever could have expected you to support one of the most popular governors in U.S. history when she was literally being sued out of office.

So there’s that.

Karl, we’re going to give you the same advice you gave Palin in 2011: Get a “slightly thicker skin.”

All Right, Enough With the ‘Ben Carson for President,’ Already

Posted in Gun Control, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , , , on March 16, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

Benjamin-Carson-220x220This is what we’re saying about Republicans. A guy gets up for 13 minutes — or 13 hours — and says something sensible and someone in the GOP forms a PAC to run him for president.

Mediaite [Excerpt]:

Dr. Ben Carson wowed the crowd at CPAC with a thoughtful speech that mixed tidbits about neuroscience with current politics and policy and in the process managed to firmly cement his position as a conservative darling. Carson drew a loud and sustained applause when he said toyed with the crowd about a possible 2016 crowd

“Let’s just say you magically put me in the White House,” he said, eliciting a roar of cheers and long applause from the crowd. [More]

Yes, applaud, jump up and down, kick Sarah Palin to the side of the road and form a new Tea Party chapter in Bumfart, Idaho.

Wake the @%!% Up!

Just the other day Dr. Carson was saying some pretty hinky things to Glenn Beck (another 25-minute conservative rock star) about gun control.

Mediaite [Excerpt]:

Asked by Beck for his thoughts on the Second Amendment, Carson gave the popular pro-gun argument: “There’s a reason for the Second Amendment; people do have the right to have weapons.”

But when asked whether people should be allowed to own “semi-automatic weapons,” the doctor replied: “It depends on where you live.”

“I think if you live in the midst of a lot of people, and I’m afraid that that semi-automatic weapon is going to fall into the hands of a crazy person, I would rather you not have it,” Carson elaborated.

However, if you live “out in the country somewhere by yourself” and want to own a semi-automatic weapon, he added, “I’ve no problem with that.”

Thank you, Dr. Feelgood. Now if you will please just cure evil in the world, no one will be around to steal my semi-automatic rifle… or my .22 Ruger target pistol, or any other gun I may happen to lawfully have in my home.

Most Second Amendment conservatives, all the way back to Wyatt Earp’s Tombstone, believe in the right of local government to pass ordinances regulating the use of firearms. However, that is a far cry from legislating what firearms citizens may own.

Dr. Carson seems to be prescribing the same old ‘fix the citizen, not the criminal’ rhetoric Republicans can get at any garden variety Democrat rally. Put simply, Dr. C: Come to my house looking to steal a gun, leave in a body bag. That will fix the problem, no mater what neighborhood you live in.

This is the same old ‘Republican Messiah’ meme all too many on the right jump into before getting their facts straight. Dr. Carson’s rationale on guns makes about as much sense as electing Dianne Feinstein to the board of the NRA.

How did this whole business get started to begin with? This is how: A communist named Lee Harvey Oswald shot a president, and the Left moved immediately to ban the sale of mail order firearms.

Did it help? In a word, no. The Manson Family killed Sharon Tate and her friends (with one gun and several knives), two attempts were made on Gerald Ford’s life, Ronald Reagan was shot; and John ‘Give Peace a Chance’ Lennon got his wheels blown off in that gun-free mecca of the Western World, New York City.

Republicans, how about getting it right next time? Send Karl Rove packing with a wedgy and nominate a conservative.

Obama Wines-Dines GOP Stupidity Klatch— While Paul Filibusters!

Posted in Barack Obama, RINO-Plasty, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , , , , , on March 7, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

th

UPDATE: McCAIN — NEW GOP GUARD: ‘WACKO BIRDS’

Breitbart:

John McCain may have finally lost it.  In an interview with Huffington Post he referred to Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) aswacko birds.”

“They were elected, nobody believes that there was a corrupt election, anything else,” McCain said. “But I also think that when, you know, it’s always the wacko birds on right and left that get the media megaphone.” Asked to clarify, McCain said he was referencing ”Rand Paul, Cruz, Amash, whoever.” [More]

Oh, now we know what John meant when he said, ‘Older than dirt.’

At a minimum $85 a pop (not including the booze), Barack Obama treated 16 Republican senators to a posh dinner bash at Washington’s Jefferson Hotel last night, during Republican Rand Paul’s historic 13-hour filibuster of Obama CIA nominee John Brennan.

What was for dinner? RINO.

White House Dossier via Drudge:

Hoping to begin rebuilding bridges frayed by years of neglect and abuse, President Obama last night bought dinner for a dozen Republican Senators as the two sides broke bread to try to begin reaching an accommodation on the budget and other issues.

Senators are not used to skimping on meals, and the dinner must have set the president – who paid out of his own pocket – back a pretty penny. Or more like some Susan Anthony dollars. [Read more]

The outing at Washington’s posh Jefferson Hotel could easily have cost a grand or two, especially if it was held at the Jefferson’s exquisite Plume restaurant, which has a prix fixe menu costing $85, before you start including booze, which senators like to include.

Just when you think Republicans cannot get any dumber, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Kelly Ayotte, Pat Toomey and nine other egoistic boneheads make a brazen public spectacle of just how deeply their party is divided.

At least Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell had the good sense to heed Brit Hume’s advice and “get his butt on the floor.

Cynical me, does anyone believe that Obama did not plan this to drive the lancet deeper between opposing factions within the GOP on the Hill?

Was it Einstein who said, “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; I’m not sure about the universe”?  These morons actually think they can negotiate with Obama, the way Obama thinks he can negotiate with Iran!

Gateway Pundit:

When Barack Obama wanted to organize a dinner with Republican Senators he knew just who to call – Senator Lindsey “Tell the Bigots to Shut Up” Graham. Last night Lindsey and twelve other Republicans went to dinner with Barack Obama in an attempt to make the far left president look bipartisan.

Lindsey spoke with reporters after the dinner.
 “So when the president asked to get together a group, I was willing and honored to do that.”

Ooo-kay, Senator.

To make matters worse, today, nursing their hangovers no doubt, McCain and Graham dared show their faces on the Senate floor pimping for Obama.

Washington Times:

Sen. Rand Paul’s filibuster didn’t thrill all of his colleagues.

Almost exactly 24 hours after Mr. Paul began his information-seeking filibuster against John O. Brennan, Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham took to the Senate floor to denounce his demands and say he was doing a “disservice” to the debate on drones.

“The country needs more senators who care about liberty, but if Mr. Paul wants to be taken seriously he needs to do more than pull political stunts that fire up impressionable libertarian kids in their college dorms. He needs to know what he’s talking about,” said Mr. McCain, Republicans’ presidential nominee in 2008 — who topped Mr. Paul’s father, former Rep. Ron Paul, in that year’s primary. [Read more]

Well, since you put it that way, John. We wouldn’t want Senator Paul out there actually inspiring young people to take an interest in government.

They should be enjoying their college years so they can go out after graduation and get a set of size 36 FFF silicone knockers and work for MSNBC giving stupid, clueless commentary. Or something.

Have ANY of these numbskulls ever noticed that Democrats absolutely NEVER criticize one another publically?

Anyone ever notice that?

h/t Drudge

Karl Rove Does Not Hate the Tea Party Anymore… Since Yesterday

Posted in RINO-Plasty, The Wrong Right Turn with tags , , , , , , on February 6, 2013 by Regular Right Guy

karl-roveThink of something dumber than Chris Christie making a laughingstock of himself by stuffing a donut in his mouth on Dave Letterman. No, not Eric Cantor becoming Speaker of the House.

Big Journalism:

Karl Rove’s appearance on Fox News’ Hannity was a straightforward and well-intentioned attempt to walk back damage done to American Crossroads by Saturday’s New York Times article, which placed Rove in direct opposition to the Tea Party. “This is not Tea Party versus establishment,” Rove stated. “I don’t want a fight.”

When Sean Hannity confronted Rove about the New York Times article, Rove immediately responded incredulously that the article was from the New York Times – of course it was biased!

But it was apparently Rove and American Crossroads that leaked their plan to the Times in the first place. [Read more]

Right, Karl, and the Palins are having you over for moose chili on Thursday.

Let’s see:

Rove and his posse locked arms with the Times and the rest of the left wing media in trashing Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann; he joined the dog pile on Christine O’Donnell in 2010 assuring the GOP would not regain the Senate, and then pulled funding this year on Todd Akin in a race he was winning against Claire McCaskill for making one stupid comment.

The trouble here as we see it is not one of establishment versus Tea Party, but one of institutional corruption within the permanent politic class. Whenever a GOP power player would rather see a Democrat win than support a “weak” conservative the problem is nuclear.

Who get’s to decide who Karl Rove thinks is the best candidate? Why Karl Rove, that’s who!

The arrogance of Rove’s argument is only surpassed by his cluelessness.

Arrogance because the people get to decided in their states and districts whom they will nominate; the Karl Roves are supposed to help them get elected, not mold the party to their personal likes and dislikes.

Clueless because Rove and even fine commentators like Charles Krauthammer, at times, cannot seem to grasp the fact that they are being used as shills by the MSM to destroy candidates the Left fear.

Full Caf Americano

Karl, just send money and shut up.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers